Strict Standards: call_user_func_array() expects parameter 1 to be a valid callback, non-static method Anderson_Makiyama_Captcha_On_Login::check_blocked_ips_befor_all() should not be called statically in /home/ecenterp/public_html/blog/wp-includes/class-wp-hook.php on line 286

Notice: register_sidebar was called incorrectly. No id was set in the arguments array for the "Sidebar" sidebar. Defaulting to "sidebar-1". Manually set the id to "sidebar-1" to silence this notice and keep existing sidebar content. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 4.2.0.) in /home/ecenterp/public_html/blog/wp-includes/functions.php on line 4147

Notice: add_custom_background is deprecated since version 3.4.0! Use add_theme_support( 'custom-background', $args ) instead. in /home/ecenterp/public_html/blog/wp-includes/functions.php on line 3839

Notice: add_custom_image_header is deprecated since version 3.4.0! Use add_theme_support( 'custom-header', $args ) instead. in /home/ecenterp/public_html/blog/wp-includes/functions.php on line 3839

Notice: get_current_theme is deprecated since version 3.4.0! Use wp_get_theme() instead. in /home/ecenterp/public_html/blog/wp-includes/functions.php on line 3839

Notice: get_theme is deprecated since version 3.4.0! Use wp_get_theme( $stylesheet ) instead. in /home/ecenterp/public_html/blog/wp-includes/functions.php on line 3839

Notice: get_themes is deprecated since version 3.4.0! Use wp_get_themes() instead. in /home/ecenterp/public_html/blog/wp-includes/functions.php on line 3839

Notice: wp_register_style was called incorrectly. Scripts and styles should not be registered or enqueued until the wp_enqueue_scripts, admin_enqueue_scripts, or login_enqueue_scripts hooks. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 3.3.0.) in /home/ecenterp/public_html/blog/wp-includes/functions.php on line 4147

Notice: wp_enqueue_style was called incorrectly. Scripts and styles should not be registered or enqueued until the wp_enqueue_scripts, admin_enqueue_scripts, or login_enqueue_scripts hooks. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 3.3.0.) in /home/ecenterp/public_html/blog/wp-includes/functions.php on line 4147

Notice: wp_register_style was called incorrectly. Scripts and styles should not be registered or enqueued until the wp_enqueue_scripts, admin_enqueue_scripts, or login_enqueue_scripts hooks. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 3.3.0.) in /home/ecenterp/public_html/blog/wp-includes/functions.php on line 4147

Notice: wp_enqueue_style was called incorrectly. Scripts and styles should not be registered or enqueued until the wp_enqueue_scripts, admin_enqueue_scripts, or login_enqueue_scripts hooks. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 3.3.0.) in /home/ecenterp/public_html/blog/wp-includes/functions.php on line 4147

Notice: Undefined index: aiosp_cpostactive in /home/ecenterp/public_html/blog/wp-content/plugins/all-in-one-seo-pack/aioseop_class.php on line 1393
April, 2015 | Ecenterpk.com
Notice: Undefined index: aiosp_cpostactive in /home/ecenterp/public_html/blog/wp-content/plugins/all-in-one-seo-pack/aioseop_class.php on line 1393

Ecenterpk.com Education Center Pakistan

30Apr/150

AVAILABILITY OF SUPERVISORY STAFF IN SECONDARY AND INTERMEDIATE EXAMINATION 2015

 

 

 

 

AVAILABILITY OF SUPERVISORY STAFF IN SECONDARY AND INTERMEDIATE EXAMINATION 2015

It has been observed that there are always some issues with supervisory staff deputed in the secondary and intermediate (Annual and supplementary ) examination. In order to conduct of the said examinations it is imperative that availability of supervisory staff must be ensured examination duties are  the part of the responsibility of teaching staff.board duty

24Apr/150

REVISED CRITERIA FOR G 5 AND G8 EXAM 2015 UNDER PEC

 

REVISED CRITERIA FOR G 5 AND G8 EXAM 2015 UNDER PECunnamed

22Apr/150

IT TEACHER NOT TO DO CLERICAL WORK EDUCATION DEPARTMENT MIANWALI

 

 

 

 

 

 

CLERICAL WORK OF IT TEACHERS DEO(SE) Mianwali  Directs all heads of Male & Female that they are not allowed to perform clerical work to the IT teachers. IT teachers are only for teaching purpose for the students of schools. If any complaint found the head of concern institute would be responsible.

 

Filed under: Notifications No Comments
20Apr/150

REVISED CRITERIA FOR THE PROMOTION OF G5 AND G8 CANDIDATES 2015 EXAMS UNDER PEC

REVISED CRITERIA FOR THE PROMOTION OF G5 AND G8 CANDIDATES 2015 EXAMS UNDER PEC

 

i Students of G5 and G8 who obtained 33 % marks shall be declared pass

ii Students of G5 and G8 who obtained 25 % marks shall be promoted to next class

iii Students of G5 who obtained 33% marks in 3 subjects shall also be provisionally  promoted to the next class subject to the condition the students will have pass the fail subjects. The head teacher of present schools may arrange examination during summer vacations.

iv. Students of G5 who obtained 33% marks in 4 subjects shall also be provisionally  promoted to the next class subject to the condition the students will have pass the fail subjects. The head teacher of present schools may arrange examination during summer vacations

revised criteria of g5 and g8

Filed under: Notifications No Comments
19Apr/150

ADJUSTMENT OF OFFICERS BPS17 TO BPS 20 UNDER IDENTIFICATION OF POSTS

Instruction letter for all DCOs and EDOs in Punjab not to transfer or adjust incumbents prior policy formulation by the School Edu Deptt. under 4 tier formula identified posts.

ADJUSTMENT OF POSTS

Filed under: Notifications No Comments
16Apr/153

School Education Punjab Summer School Timing

School Education Punjab Summer School Timing

Here is attached Different District School Timing Notifications.

EDO Lahore

EDO Kasur

EDO Pakpattan

Special Thanks Attique ur Rehman Farooqi

11148973_1559818037641229_563816105_n 11156967_1559818054307894_1098772846_n 11160515_1559818077641225_1329016167_n

Filed under: Uncategorized 3 Comments
15Apr/150

Provision of PER and Result For the year 2014

Provision of PER and Result For the year 2014

Promotion from BS 19 to 20 Male    From seniority no 161 to 135

Promotion from BS 19 to 20 FeMale    From seniority no 139 to 260

Promotion from BS 18 to 19 Male    From seniority no 601 to 1250

Promotion from BS 18 to 19 FeMale    From seniority no 501 to 646

provision of PER

12Apr/150

Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan Teaching and non Teaching Positions Vacant

Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan Teaching and non Teaching Positions Vacant

Assistant Professor

ZOOLOGY

COMMERCE

ECONOMICS

COMMUNICATION

ENGLISH

MATHEMATICS

BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

CHEMISTRY

AGRICULTURE

GENDER STUDIES

PHYSICS

AGRICULTURE ENGINEERING

 

All posts are on TTS (Tenure Track Basis ) Ph.D in Relevant Field

LECTURER

STATISTICS

ECONOMICS

COMMERECE

ENGLISH

CHEMISTRY

GENDER STUDIES

INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS

SPORTS SCIENCES

BUSINESS ENGINEERING

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING

ADVANCED MATERIAL

AGRICULTURE ENGINEERING

VETERINARY  SCIENCE( LIVE STOCK, POULTRY PRODUCTION, VETERINARY PHARMACOLOGY, ANIMAL NUTRITION,  MEAT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, ANIMAL BREEDING & GENETICS)

AGRICULTURE ENGINEERING FOOD SCIENCES

NON TEACHING POSITIONS

DEPUTY DIRECTOR

ASSISTANT ENGINEER (ELECTRICAL)

VETERINARY OFFICER

ASSISTANCE ENGINEER

DATA ANALYST

LAB. ENGINEER

WEB MASTER

IT SPECIALIST

PROGRAM MANAGER / PRODUCER

LAB SUPERVISOR

COMPUTER LAB TECHNICIAN

NON LINEAR EDITOR

RADIO STUDIO OPERATOR

COMPUTER ATTENDANT

IMAGE0001

 

LAST DATE 8th  MAY 2015

for further detail please visit the link

http://bzu.edu.pk/positions-vacant-faculty-and-nonteaching-posts_1997.html

9Apr/150

Lahore High Court Order Regarding Income Tax of Heads and Principal

 

Form No:HCJD/C-121

ORDER SHEET

IN THE LAHORE HIGH COURT MULTAN BENCH MULTAN

JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT

 

Case     W.P.  No.296/2014.

 

District Headmasters/ Principals     VS   Federation of Pakistan, etc.

Association, Multan through its

President Syed Mehmood Nabi.

S.No. of order/    Date of order/   Order with signature of Judge, and that of parties or counsel,

Proceeding         Proceeding      where necessary

 

14.01.2015   Raja Naveed Azam, Advocate for the petitioner.

Agha. Muhammad Akmal Khan, advocate for the

respondents.

The petitioner through this writ petition has
challenged a clarification circulated by the Central
Board of Revenue/FBR Income Tax Department
dated 18.5.2005, whereby the tax rebate/reduction
granted to the full time teachers or researchers
employed in a non-profit education or research
institution recognized by the Higher Education
Commission, has withdrawn on the ground, that

the     teachers     who   are   performing   any

administrative or managerial job e.g. principals, headmasters, doctors vice chancellors etc. are not entitled to the aforesaid rebate.

  1. The record annexed with this petition was
    examined and scrutinized with assistance of the
    learned counsel for the parties.
  2. It is  found  from  the  record,  that  the
    respondent   department   i.e.   Income   Tax
    Department through a Circular No.3 of 2006 dated

11.7.2006 extended a favour to the members of the

 

 

 

W.P.No.296/2014.                        2

 

teaching faculty by giving 50% to 75% tax rebate on his income from salary. The relevant part of the aforesaid circular is reproduced as under:-

 

“GOVERNMENT OF THE PAKISTAN

(REVENUE DIVISION)

CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE

**

C.No.4(5)ITR/06                             Islamabad, July 11, 2006

Circular No.03 of 2006
(Income Tax)

Subject.   COMPUTATION OF INCOME TAX PAYABLE BY
THE  SALARIES  TAXPAYERS  FOR  TAX YEAR
2007  AND  DEDUCTION  OF  ADVANCE  TAX
FROM   SALARY   FOR   THE   TAX   YEAR
COMMENCING 1ST JULY 2006

Tax in the case of a salaried taxpayer shall be
computed in accordance with sections 12, 13 and 14 of Income
Tax Ordinance 2001, read with rules 2 to 7 of income Tax
Rules 2002.  A  salaried  taxpayer  means  where  salary
constitutes more than 50% of the total income. All perquisites,
allowances or benefits, [excepting those covered under Part-I
of the Second Schedule to the Ordinance], are to be included
in the salary and rate of tax prescribed in Part-I of the First
Schedule shall be applied for the tax year 2007 on the gross
figure. The taxation of salaried taxpayer is explained as under:

  1. REBATE FOR TEACHERS AND RESEARCHERS

POSTED IN GOVERNMENT INSTITUTIONS

A full time teacher or a researcher, employed in a non-profit education or research institution recognized by Higher Education Commission (HEC), a Board of Education or a University was entitled to a benefit, under Part III of Second Schedule to the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 and his tax liability stood reduced by an amount equal to 75% of tax payable on his income from salary.

This concession has now been extended to full time teachers and researchers employed in government training and research institutions also.”

  1. The petitioner who are full time teachers,
    welcomed the favour extended by the respondent
    department and  feel  comfortable  but  all  of  a
    sudden the respondent department through circular
    No.6 of 2013 dated 19.7.2013 made amendment in
    second schedule of the income tax and reduced the
    rebate from 75% to 40% and also excluded the
    teaching staff performing any administrative or

 

 

 

W.P.No.296/2014.                        3

 

managerial job. It is necessary to reproduce the
same:-

 

“GOVERNMENT OF THE PAKISTAN

(REVENUE DIVISION)

FEDERAL BOARD OF REVENUE

**

C.No.4(36)ITP/2013                  Islamabad, the 19 July, 2013

Circular No.6 of 2013
Income Tax

Subject.   FINANCE   ACT,         2013    -   EXPLANATION

REGARDING   IMPORTANT   AMENDMENTS
MADE IN THE INCOME TAX ORDINANCE, 2001

Salient features of the amendments made in the Income Tax Ordinance, 2001 through Finance Act, 2013 are explained as under:-

  1. AMENDMENTS IN SECOND SCHEDULE

In Second Schedule to the Income Tax Ordinance,
2001 some of the amendments made are as follows:

(a)…

(b)…

(c)…

(d) In Part-III in clause (2) reduction in tax liability of the tax payable on income from salary equal to 75% has been reduced to 40% in the case of:

(i) a full time teacher employed in a non profit
educational  institution  duly  recognized  by
Higher  Education  Commission,  a  Board  of
Education or a University recognized by the
Higher   Education   Commission,   including
government training institutions.

(ii)   a full time researcher employed in a research
institution duly recognized by Higher Education
Commission,  a  Board  of  Education  or  a
university recognized by the Higher Education
Commission,  including  government  research
institution.

(iii)     It is further clarified that a full time teacher

means a person employed purely for teaching
and  not  performing  any  administrative  or
managerial jobs e.g. principals, headmasters,

directors,        vice-chancellors,       chairmen,

controllers etc. similarly a full time researcher
means a person purely employed for research
job only in a research institution and such
institution  is  purely  performing  research
activities.”

 

  1. The respondent department did not restrain
    itself to this extend but also issued a clarification

 

 

 

W.P.No.296/2014.                        4

 

of additional 50% tax reduction in the case of full time teachers, which is reproduced as under:-

 

“GOVERNMENT OF THE PAKISTAN

CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE
INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT

….

MTU/2005/
May 18, 2005

District Accounts Officer Sherikhupura

Subject. Clarification of additional 50% tax reduction in the
case of full time teachers.

Reference Several applications No(s). Nil Dated May 18, 2005 by the District Sheikhupura

Head Masters.

It is to clarify that according to clause (2) part III of second
schedule of income tax ordinance 2001, is reproduced as

under:

“In addition to the reduction specified in sub-clause (i),
the tax payable by a full time teacher or a researcher,
employed  in  a  non  profit  education  or  research
institution including government training and research
institution duly recognized by a Board of Education or
a university or the University grants commission, shall
be further reduced by an amount equal to 50% of the
tax payable after the aforesaid reduction”

In order to qualify for tax reduction under the above noted provision, the following conditions have to be fulfilled:

  1. A full time teacher which means

   A  regular  employee      (full  time  faculty

member);

   Not  a  part  time  teacher   (visiting  faculty-

member);

According to code of action “Dastoor-ul-Amaal” issued by Education Department of Punjab.”

  1. Non profit education institution which means

  An institution which has been established not
to earn profit.

Since both of these conditions are met with in their cases.
Hence, Head Masters are eligible for this additional 50% tax
reduction.

(Ashraf Ahmed Ali)

Commissioner Income Tax ”

  1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits
    that the  concession  given  by  the  respondent
    department in payment of income tax on salary has
    already been acted upon and the petitioner and
    others  are  practicing  the  same,  therefore,  the
    respondents  under  the  principal  of  loscus
    poenitentiae, cannot withdraw the same by any

 

 

 

W.P.No.296/2014.                        5

 

clarification  and  without  giving  any  right  of hearing to the petitioner/beneficiaries.

  1. In this case, the respondents department in
    fact, in a very clandestine manner, excluded the
    persons who although are teachers, teaching in an
    educational institution  i.e.  school,  college  or
    university but also performing administrative or
    managerial job.  The respondent department in fact
    has clarified the relevant provision in a manner so
    that the persons who although are teachers but
    performing managerial job too have been excluded
    which in any case cannot be the intention of the
    law maker at the time of granting this benefit to the
    petitioner.
  2. Now it is to be seen, whether a teacher i.e.
    headmaster, principal etc., can be excluded from
    the beneficiaries of the afore-referred notification
    on the  ground  they  are  also  performing  the
    managerial duty. In many educational institutions,
    the headmaster or the principal also teach the
    students and further if a teacher after some time
    promoted as headmaster and as the case may be, a
    lecturer as principal, cannot be excluded from the
    definition of a teacher. In fact the respondent
    department  has  made  a  novel  clarification  or
    interpretation, which in any case is against the
    principal of interpretation.
  3. The benefit and concession granted by the
    respondent department in the shape of rebate in
    payment of income tax on the salary, as admitted
    by the respondent has already been acted upon,
    therefore, the  right  accrued  in  favour  of  the

 

 

 

W.P.No.296/2014.                        6

 

petitioner by way of the aforesaid circular can in
any manner not be taken away or withdrawn.
Reliance is placed upon Arif Hussain Dar v. Board
of Revenue through Secretary, Muzaffarabad and
5 others (PLD 2002 Azad J&K 14), Aziz Ahmad v.
Provincial Police Officer (I.-G.P.) Punjab Lahore

and   6  others    (PLD   2005  Lahore   185)  and

Muhammad Nadeem Arif and others v. Inspector-
General of Police, Punjab, Lahore and others

(2011 SCMR 408). In PLD 2002 Azad J&K 14
(Supra), it was held that “the Policy or the Notification
cannot  override  the  Statutory  Rules  framed  by  the
Government under a Statute.” In PLD 2005 Lahore
185 (Supra) it was held that “The Departmental

circular is not more than a departmental instructions. The
Departmental circular/instruction even cannot be called a
rule. The Departmental circular are good enough for the
internal management and control but they cannot confer
a right or deprive a person of a right, which is only
possible on the basis of a statutory provisions or a rule
made by a competent authority under the concept of
delegated legislation, as held in Sub. Muhammad Asghar

  1. Safia Begum and others PLD 1976 SC 435.” In 2011
    SCMR 408, the  Hon’ble  Supreme  Court  of
    Pakistan held that “The learned High Court in the
    impugned judgment after quoting all the relevant rules
    and provisions of Police Act had given findings of fact
    that Office Order dated 23-2-2002/8-11-2002 was issued
    by the Inspector-General of Police without approval of the
    Government of the Punjab, therefore, the same has no
    legal sanctity. Section 12 of the Police Act confers power
    upon the Inspector-General of Police to frame rules after
    securing approval from the Government of the Punjab.”

Even otherwise, the learned counsel for the
respondent   could   not   refer   any   plausible

 

 

 

W.P.No.296/2014.                        7

 

explanation or rebuttal to the contention or claim agitated by the petitioner.

 

  1. In view  of  the  above,  the  impugned

notification is not sustain in law, resultantly, this petition is allowed. No order as to cost.

(Ali Akbar Qureshi)

Judge

*Jamshed *

Approved for reporting

Judge

for further detail about the judgement

http://sys.lhc.gov.pk/appjudgments/2015LHC986.pdf

Filed under: Court Cases No Comments
7Apr/150

آئی ٹی ٹیچرز گزٹڈ کلرک کے طور پر خدمات انجام دینے لگے

لاہور (رفیعہ ناہید اکرام) پنجاب کے ہزاروں سکولوں میں تعینات پانچ ہزار سے زائد آئی ٹی ٹیچرز کی اکثریت ایک کروڑ بیس لاکھ طلبہ و طالبات کو کمپیوٹر سائنس کی تعلیم دینے کی بجائے ’’گزٹڈ کلرک‘‘ کے طور پر خدمات انجام دینے پر مجبور ہے جس سے مڈل، ہائی اور ہائر سیکنڈری سکولوں میں زیرتعلیم چھٹی جماعت سے بارہویں تک کے طلبہ و طالبات کے تعلیمی نتائج متاثر ہو رہے ہیں اور وہ اساتذہ کے سکول میں ہونے کے باوجود کلاس رومز تک نہ پہنچ پانے پر شدید پریشان ہیں۔ دوسری جانب صوبہ بھر میں آئی ٹی ٹیچرز 500 سے زائد اسامیاں خالی ہیں جبکہ نئی ایجوکیشن پالیسی کے مطابق 40 طالبعلموں کیلئے ایک استاد ہونا چاہئے مگر آئی ٹی میں 27 سو طالبعلموں کیلئے ایک استاد ہے اور وہ بھی دفتری کاموں میں مصروف رہتا ہے۔ واضح رہے کہ حکومت نے چھٹی سے آٹھویں تک کمپیوٹر ایجوکیشن کو لازمی قرار دیا ہے جبکہ نویں اور دسویں میں اختیار ہونے کے باوجود شوق سے اس سبجیکٹ کو اختیار کرتے ہیں مگر مڈل، ہائی اور ہائر سیکنڈری سکولوں کے اکثر اساتذہ نئی نسل کو کمپیوٹر سائنس کی تعلیم سے بہرہ مند کرنے کی بجائے سارا سال پرنسپلوں کے حکم پر کلیریکل کاموں مثلاً سکول کی ڈاک کی تیاری و بھجوانے کے عمل، پرائمری ایگزامینیشن کمشن کیلئے پانچویں اور آٹھویں جماعت کی ڈیٹا انٹری، نویں اور دسویں جماعت کی رجسٹریشن اور آن لائن داخلے، ہائر سیکنڈری سکولوں میں فرسٹ ایئر اور سیکنڈ ایئر کی رجسٹریشن اور داخلے، دفتری ای میلز اور ووٹر لسٹوں کے کام سمیت کمپیوٹر و انٹرنیٹ سے متعلقہ تمام کام لئے جاتے ہیں مگر اصل ’’کام‘‘ جس کی وہ تنخواہ وصول کر رہے ہیں اور جس کی وجہ سے انہیں تعینات کیا گیا ہے اس کے لئے انہیں وقت ہی نہیں دیا جاتا۔ گزشتہ روز نوائے وقت سے گفتگو میں پنجاب ایسوسی ایشن آف آئی ٹی ٹیچرز کے صدر کاشف چودھری اور نائب صدر فرخندہ امین نے کہا کہ ہم سارا سال ہیڈ ٹیچرز کے حکم پر کلیریکل کام میں مصروف رہتے ہیں، طالبعلموں کا تعلیمی ہرج دیکھ کر دل خون کے آنسو روتا ہے  اور ستم بالائے ستم اس پر ہمیں ہی قصور وار ٹھہرایا جاتا ہے۔نوائے وقت